Skip to main content

Set Top Box Emulator and OAuth2 Device Flow

This is really an extension to a blog I did in October 2015 - Device Authorization using OAuth2 and OpenAM, with an application written in Node.js using the newly released OpenAM 13.0.

The basic flow hasn't really changed. Ultimately there is a client - the TV emulator - that communicates to OpenAM and the end user, with the end user also performing out-of-band operations via a device which has better UI capabilities - aka a tablet or laptop.


The app boots and initiates a request to OpenAM to get a unique user and device code, prompting the user to hit a specific URL on their tablet.


The user authenticates with the OpenAM resource server as necessary, enters the code and performs a consent dance to approve the request from the TV to be paired and retrieve data from the user's profile - in this case, overloading the postaladdress attribute in DJ to store favourite channel data.



In the meantime, the TV client is performing a polling operation - checking with the OpenAM authorization service, to see if the end user has entered the correct user_code and approved the request.  Once completed the TV retrieves a typical OAuth2 bearer payload, including the refresh_token and access_token values that can be used to retrieve the necessary attributes.



Future requests from the TV now no longer need to request password or authorization data.  By leveraging a long live refresh_token access can be managed centrally.


For more information on OAuth2 Device Flow see here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WebAuthn Authentication in AM 6.5

ForgeRock AccessManagement 6.5, will have out of the box integration for the W3C WebAuthn. This modern “FIDO2” standard allows cryptographic passwordless authentication – integrating with a range of native authenticators, from USB keys to fingerprint and facial recognition systems found natively in many mobile and desktop operating systems.
Why is this so cool? Well firstly we know passwords are insecure and deliver a poor user experience. But aren’t there loads of strong MFA solutions out there already? Well, there are, but many are proprietary, require complex integrations and SDK’s and ultimately, don’t provide the level of agility that many CISO’s and application designers now require. 
Rolling out a secure authentication system today, will probably only result in further integration costs and headaches tomorrow, when the next “cool” login method emerges.
Having a standards based approach, allows for easier inter-operability and a more agile platform for change.
AM 6.5 has int…

OAuth2 With Contextual Binding

I've blogged a few times regarding the trend of implementing Zero Trust and CARTA (Continuous Adaptive Risk and Trust Assessment) style journeys during typical Web single sign on flows.  I want to riff on that process a little, with an update on how to implement something similar for OAuth2/OIDC access tokens.

Why is this important? Well sometimes it is important to apply some context to a particular authorization flow.  Not all access decisions are the same.  Think of the following nuanced situations:

Two users with the same set of scopes, have different API consumption patternsA particular user has downloaded a malicious app which alters the botnet reputation of the request IP addressA particular user has registered their work email address with a site that experienced a credentials breachA media site is behind a paywall and limits access to organisational IP ranges, but a user frequently works in the field These sorts of flows, are a little bit different to the standard Proof of…

Implementing Zero Trust & CARTA within AM 6.x

There is an increasing focus on perimeterless approaches to security design and the buzzy "defensive security architectures".  This blog will take a brief look at implementing a contextual and continuous approach to access management, that can help to fulfil those design aspirations.

The main concept, is to basically collect some sort of contextual data at login time, and again at resource access time - and basically look for differences between the two.  But why is this remotely interesting?  Firstly, big walls, don't necessarily mean safer houses.  The classic firewall approach to security.  Keeping the bad out and the good in.  That concept no longer works for the large modern enterprise.  The good and bad are everywhere and access control decisions should really be based on data above and beyond that directly related to the user identity, with enforcement as close as possible to the protected resource as possible.

With Intelligent AuthX, we can start to collect and s…