Skip to main content

Conditional URL Policy Evaluation in OpenAM


To perform conditional URL evaluation (where there are arguments in the URL that will change and impact the policy decision), a custom policy evaluation plugins needs implementing - http://docs.forgerock.org/en/openam/11.0.0/dev-guide/index/chap-policy-spi.html

Use Case

URL to contain all information required to make a policy decision, but components of the URL vary adding context.


In this example an organisation number prefixs users, whilst the user number suffixes users. A condition should exist where only users who are managers AND managers of the same organisation of the user they're accessing should be allowed.



Implementation

Either build out a specific policy plugin, or use the existing community contributed ScriptedCondition plugin which allows for the use of Javascript to build out the condition evaluation. ScriptedCondition is available from the OpenAM trunk source - http://sources.forgerock.org/browse/openam/trunk/community/extensions/ScriptedCondition/README.txt?hb=true

Build the ScriptedCondition.java plugin and compile against the OpenAM core and shared libraries, and add to a policy-plugins.jar, before dropping into the ../openam/WEB-INF/lib directory.

Extensions to the OpenAM services schema are needed to allow for the selection of the new condition type. Follow instructions in the ScriptedCondition README. A restart of Tomcat will result in the ScriptedCondition being available in policy edit screens.




So the above Javascript basically does a compare of the org value that is split from the URL and a session attribute that holds the users organisation value, before returning a true or false back to the condition decision method.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WebAuthn Authentication in AM 6.5

ForgeRock AccessManagement 6.5, will have out of the box integration for the W3C WebAuthn. This modern “FIDO2” standard allows cryptographic passwordless authentication – integrating with a range of native authenticators, from USB keys to fingerprint and facial recognition systems found natively in many mobile and desktop operating systems.
Why is this so cool? Well firstly we know passwords are insecure and deliver a poor user experience. But aren’t there loads of strong MFA solutions out there already? Well, there are, but many are proprietary, require complex integrations and SDK’s and ultimately, don’t provide the level of agility that many CISO’s and application designers now require. 
Rolling out a secure authentication system today, will probably only result in further integration costs and headaches tomorrow, when the next “cool” login method emerges.
Having a standards based approach, allows for easier inter-operability and a more agile platform for change.
AM 6.5 has int…

OAuth2 With Contextual Binding

I've blogged a few times regarding the trend of implementing Zero Trust and CARTA (Continuous Adaptive Risk and Trust Assessment) style journeys during typical Web single sign on flows.  I want to riff on that process a little, with an update on how to implement something similar for OAuth2/OIDC access tokens.

Why is this important? Well sometimes it is important to apply some context to a particular authorization flow.  Not all access decisions are the same.  Think of the following nuanced situations:

Two users with the same set of scopes, have different API consumption patternsA particular user has downloaded a malicious app which alters the botnet reputation of the request IP addressA particular user has registered their work email address with a site that experienced a credentials breachA media site is behind a paywall and limits access to organisational IP ranges, but a user frequently works in the field These sorts of flows, are a little bit different to the standard Proof of…

Implementing Zero Trust & CARTA within AM 6.x

There is an increasing focus on perimeterless approaches to security design and the buzzy "defensive security architectures".  This blog will take a brief look at implementing a contextual and continuous approach to access management, that can help to fulfil those design aspirations.

The main concept, is to basically collect some sort of contextual data at login time, and again at resource access time - and basically look for differences between the two.  But why is this remotely interesting?  Firstly, big walls, don't necessarily mean safer houses.  The classic firewall approach to security.  Keeping the bad out and the good in.  That concept no longer works for the large modern enterprise.  The good and bad are everywhere and access control decisions should really be based on data above and beyond that directly related to the user identity, with enforcement as close as possible to the protected resource as possible.

With Intelligent AuthX, we can start to collect and s…