Skip to main content

Getting OAuth2 Access Tokens Using SAML2 Assertion

A use case which I've seen been brought up in proof of concepts and client workshops, has been that of using an existing SAML2 IDP assertion as part of an authorization grant for an OAuth2 access/refresh token.  OpenAM v11 provides support for the IETF Draft for SAML 2.0 Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants as documented in the Admin guide in chapter 13.


This sort of dance is becoming of more interest, as organisations look to leverage not only REST based services (which the OAuth2 endpoints provide), but also the increased use of mobile and non-browser based content delivery.  SAML2 (whether that is dead or not is another blog...) is still pretty much omnipresent in federated landscapes, so being able to make use of existing investments in this area, whilst being able to build out REST based modular services is a very powerful concept.

OpenAM v11 can act as both the SAML2 service provider and OAuth2 authorization server in a single instance, making use of an assertion processing adapter class at org.forgerock.restlet.ext.oauth2.flow.OAuth2Saml2GrantSPAdapter which takes the IDP's SAML2 assertion and passes it across to the /access_token OAuth2 endpoint to respond with a JSON object containing the access token.


A few important steps - although these are documented - is to make sure the SP requests that the assertion is signed and also that the OAuth2 client name matches the SAML2 service provider entity name (ideally a URL, as a non-URL based name seems to cause issue).



Once the token has been retrieved, the /token_info could be called to verify validity or to retrieve associated scopes.  It's also worth noting that the access_token lifetime is not related to the session lifetime at the IDP or SP side.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WebAuthn Authentication in AM 6.5

ForgeRock AccessManagement 6.5 , will have out of the box integration for the W3C WebAuthn . This modern “FIDO2” standard allows cryptographic passwordless authentication – integrating with a range of native authenticators, from USB keys to fingerprint and facial recognition systems found natively in many mobile and desktop operating systems. Why is this so cool? Well firstly we know passwords are insecure and deliver a poor user experience. But aren’t there loads of strong MFA solutions out there already? Well, there are, but many are proprietary, require complex integrations and SDK’s and ultimately, don’t provide the level of agility that many CISO’s and application designers now require.  Rolling out a secure authentication system today, will probably only result in further integration costs and headaches tomorrow, when the next “cool” login method emerges. Having a standards based approach, allows for easier inter-operability and a more agile platform for chan

Implementing Zero Trust & CARTA within AM 6.x

There is an increasing focus on perimeterless approaches to security design and the buzzy "defensive security architectures".  This blog will take a brief look at implementing a contextual and continuous approach to access management, that can help to fulfil those design aspirations. The main concept, is to basically collect some sort of contextual data at login time, and again at resource access time - and basically look for differences between the two.  But why is this remotely interesting?  Firstly, big walls, don't necessarily mean safer houses.  The classic firewall approach to security.  Keeping the bad out and the good in.  That concept no longer works for the large modern enterprise.  The good and bad are everywhere and access control decisions should really be based on data above and beyond that directly related to the user identity, with enforcement as close as possible to the protected resource as possible. With Intelligent AuthX, we can start to collect an

Set Session Limits Using Context

Session limits typically cover 4 main items: total number of sessions a user can have at any one time, the max length of each session, the max idle time and max caching time. In an out of the box deployment in ForgeRock AM, these settings are configured via the session service.  However there are few tweaks than can be made to allow these settings to be run via a per user or per tree flow.  For example. think of the following scenario - user is logging via a device, location or network that has a higher risk rating.   Perhaps you would like to reduce session length on a BYOD device running an out of support version of Android to have a length of only 15 minutes.  If they switched back to their main trusted device, we can spin that back to 1hr. Another example, could be the spotting of a higher suspicion of bot activity for a particular user.  Maybe we need to set the entire quota limit to 1, to stop a bot spawning multiple sessions with the same credentials. This is all pretty trivial